Comparison
Nativestarter vs TurboStarter
TurboStarter covers the widest surface of anything in this category: Next.js web, Expo mobile, and a Plasmo browser extension, all on Supabase. Nativestarter covers less ground and goes deeper into mobile. If your product is primarily a web app that also has a phone app, TurboStarter is the better fit. If the phone app is the product, this is.
Where TurboStarter wins
Breadth. If you genuinely need web, mobile and a browser extension sharing one codebase, TurboStarter is the only option that ships all three, and rebuilding that yourself would cost far more than $499.
Choose TurboStarter
- Web is your primary surface and mobile is secondary
- You need a browser extension in the same monorepo
- You are already committed to Supabase
- You want the widest platform coverage for the price
Choose Nativestarter
- Mobile is the product, not a companion app
- You want the backend in your repo rather than in a vendor dashboard
- You need the App Store and Play Store shipping guides
- You want Agent Skills, not just a rules file
- You want native depth — Turbo Modules, config plugins, prebuild discipline
Side by side
| Nativestarter | TurboStarter | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $299–$1,499 | $179–$499 |
| Primary surface | Mobile | Web |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, web | Web, mobile, browser extension |
| Backend | Yours, in-repo | Supabase |
| Runs with zero API keys | Yes | No — needs provider config |
| Agent Skills | Six, spec-compliant | Not included |
| App Store playbooks | Four | Not included |
| Native module guidance | Dedicated skill + docs | Minimal |
| Agency licence | $1,499, white-label | Not offered |